EMW

then how do religious folk justify hating gays for one passage that they take absolutely literally, though they don't take most of the bible literally

Who is the government, or anybody else, to tell us who we can and can't love. I thought this was the free world.

So you're cool if your sister wants to marry a bridge or a wall? I've actually seen on another forum that someone married the Berlin Wall. My point is: man and women marriage has been the way of life for thousands of years, and its worked! How far should you go with freedoms, and who has the right to determine that?

I was going to mention that argument, but I thought it would be random and pointless seeing as nobody would be so empty-minded as to address this but apparently I underestimated your intelligence. First off, marriage, to some people is all about god and shit like that, but to everybody, marriage is about spending a lifetime with someone and sharing money, property, stuff like that. Obviously if a guy marries a dog, the dog won't know what the hell is going on. A dog won't be able to make decisions on money or financials. Another man, however, is capable of doing that.

This argument is so absurd. It's like asking what somebody wants to eat and for dinner somebody says ice cream. Ice cream is, in some peoples eyes, immoral seeing as it's not a dinner. Most people would say chicken or rice or potatoes. Now according to this argument, if we allow this person to have ice cream for dinner, eventually lots more will want ice cream. Then they will evolve to want to eat something like a toy truck or a tree. That kind of thing won't happen. I do admit that some people will want to marry their pets but it won't functionally work, just like eating a toy truck won't give you the nutrition that you need.

I hope I made my point and I hope I didn't mean to offend you at the beginning. I was a little pissed and irritated and I'm sorry.

-Sam

I think that the whole spirit of it is sickly, and degrades from true potential.